0259f0ac-9ec2-4ec6-8c9b-1340e264fde8

South Korea's Son Heung-Min benched: A gamble that could cost them the World Cup

Coach benches captain for first time since 2010

Celeste Moreau||Source: ESPN World Cup
South Korea's Son Heung-Min benched: A gamble that could cost them the World Cup
Photo by Minh Tâm Nguyễn Ngọc on Pexels

Jaws dropped in Doha on Wednesday when South Korea coach Hong Myung-Bo left captain Son Heung-Min on the bench for the must-win Group A clash against South Africa. It was the first time since 2010 that Son had not started a World Cup match. A decision that reeked of either genius or madness — and with the scoreline still 0-0 at half-time, the madness was winning.

The gamble that stunned the football world

Son Heung-Min is not just South Korea's best player. He is their talisman, their heart, their one man who can conjure something from nothing. To bench him in a game where a loss means elimination is like a general leaving his best soldier in the tent during a siege. Hong’s reasoning? He wanted to “manage Son’s workload” and freshen up the attack. Manage his workload? This is the World Cup. There’s no next week.

Son had played every minute of the tournament’s first two group games — a grueling 1-1 draw with Mexico and a desperate 2-0 loss to France. He looked tired, yes. But so did everyone in that sweltering heat. The difference is, Son is the one player who can produce a moment of magic.

“It was a coach’s call. I respect it, but I don’t agree with it. You don’t bench your captain in a knockout-or-go-home game.” – Former South Korea international Park Ji-Sung

Hong’s lineup sent a message: we can beat South Africa without him. That is a dangerous message to send to a team that has already punched above its weight in this tournament. South Africa, ranked 65th in the world, had held France to a draw and beaten Mexico 1-0. They were no pushovers.

The Son-shaped hole in the attack

Without Son, South Korea’s attack looked toothless. They dominated possession — 63% in the first half — but created only one clear chance. It was a header from Kim Min-Jae that sailed over the bar. The passing was sideways. The movement was static. The fear was palpable.

Son’s replacement, Hwang Hee-Chan, worked hard but lacks the final-third spark. He is a runner, not a creator. Without Son dropping deep to pick up the ball, the midfield and attack were disconnected. South Africa, sensing the anxiety, grew in confidence. They had two shots on target in the first half, forcing South Korean goalkeeper Kim Seung-Gyu into sharp saves.

The absence of Son also affected the set pieces. He is the designated taker of corners and free kicks. Without him, the deliveries were poor — floated, not whipped. South Africa’s defenders cleared them with ease.

A history of benching the captain

This is not the first time Hong has made a controversial lineup decision. In the 2014 World Cup, he was criticized for benching Park Ji-Sung in a crucial group stage match against Belgium. South Korea lost 1-0 and crashed out. History, it seems, repeats itself.

But this feels different. Son is 33 now. This is almost certainly his last World Cup. He has carried this team on his back for a decade. To watch him sit on the bench, chewing gum, eyes fixed on the pitch, was uncomfortable. It was like watching a lion caged while the hyenas prowled.

And yet, there is a case for Hong. Son had played over 400 minutes of football in the last month — club and country. His legs were heavy. South Korea need him for the knockout stages, should they advance. But that is a big if. If they don’t get past South Africa, the debate will rage for years: was it worth resting your best player in a game you cannot afford to lose?

“Sometimes you have to think long-term. If Son gets injured or is exhausted, we have no chance in the next round. But first, we have to get there.” – Hong Myung-Bo, pre-match press conference

Long-term thinking in a short-term tournament is a luxury. And South Korea, for all their talent, are not a team that can afford luxuries.

The second half: Son enters, but is it too late?

Hong finally brought Son on in the 58th minute, with the score still 0-0. The crowd erupted. South Korea instantly looked more dangerous. Son drifted into pockets of space, drew defenders, and created two chances in his first five minutes. One was a curling shot that forced a save, another a through ball that Hwang Hee-Chan scuffed wide.

But the momentum was short-lived. South Africa, to their credit, did not buckle. They defended deep, packed the box, and hit on the counter. In the 78th minute, they almost scored when a long ball caught the South Korean defense napping, but the forward’s shot was straight at the keeper.

As the clock ticked past 90 minutes, the tension was unbearable. A draw would not be enough — South Korea needed a win to guarantee qualification, as Mexico and France were winning their matches. A draw would leave them needing results elsewhere to go through.

In the end, the game finished 0-0. South Korea’s fate now rests on the outcome of the other Group A matches. They might scrape through, they might not. But the narrative will be forever stained by this one decision.

The verdict: A wrong gamble

Hong Myung-Bo gambled. And he lost. Not just the game, but the trust. You do not bench your captain in a World Cup must-win. You let him die on the sword if necessary. But you do not leave him on the bench.

Son Heung-Min deserved better. South Korea deserved better. And if they are packing their bags after the group stage, the question will echo: what if he had started?

We will never know. But that’s the thing about gambles — sometimes you lose everything.

Advertisement
#World Cup#South Korea#Son Heung-Min#Hong Myung-Bo#Group A
分享到:XfWB